Nick Clegg’s party has said it “supports” developers seeking damages from local authorities that raise objections “in contravention” of Government planning policy.
In a policy paper, the Lib Dems attack Conservative councils that register opposition to wind farms and claim that only 10 per cent of the population are “consistently opposed” to turbines.
Glyn Davies, MP for Montgomeryshire, described the Lib Dem position as “outrageous” and an “insult to local democracy”.
The policy document states: “Liberal Democrats would support developers who seek punitive damages against councils who do not follow National Policy Guidelines in determining consents.”
“For example, many (particularly Conservative) councils have adopted criteria (such as minimum separation distances from dwellings), in contravention of government planning policy.”
Eric Pickles, the Local Government Secretary, has promised to “give local communities a greater say” on where wind farms are built.
The Government issued guidance that officials said would effectively end the spread of turbines, which have been blamed for blighting landscapes.
There were concerns last month that the guidance had been watered down after a separate planning document warned councils not to create “inflexible” turbine-free zones by imposing blanket bans of wind farms being built near houses.
However, sources at the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) last night said that ministers remain committed to helping “councils turn down inappropriate wind turbines and resist unwarranted planning appeals”.
Peter Luff, Conservative MP for Mid Worcestershire, who last year tried to bring in laws stopping wind farms being built less than 2km from housing, said: “It’s an extraordinary position. The Lib Dems aren’t going to win many friends in rural constituencies.
“Of course there must be national policy guidelines on controversial planning questions…but we also believe in localism and local communities are often better-placed to judge what is suitable for their area.”
He added: “What it so special about wind turbines that Liberal Democrats obsess with getting them built in inappropriate locations?”
And Shaun Spiers, chief executive of the Campaign to Protect Rural England, said: “I would be surprised if there weren’t some Liberal Democrat councils seeking to block wind farms.
“It certainly is really unhelpful language to be using. If you care about climate change and if you think that renewable energy has an important part to play in stopping climate change then what you don’t want to be doing is affronting decent people who care about their landscapes because you bring the whole argument into disrepute.”
Jake Berry, MP for Rossendale and Darwen, added: “I am very concerned about these plans for a backdoor stealth tax on councils who stand up for their local residents against big corporate wind farm developers.
“Liberal Democrats' obsession with big business and towering wind turbines is so blinkered that they want to abandon localism and local decision-making.”
The wind farms policy paper will be debated at the upcoming Lib Dem conference in Glasgow. If it is approved, it will become party policy and could become part of the manifesto for the 2015 election
It also claims that in public opinion surveys, wind farms “consistently attract support from around two-thirds of the public” but that “the 10 per cent or so who are consistently opposed are usually more vocal”.
2013年8月6日 星期二
Falmouth Board of Health Will Endorse Turbine Bill
Falmouth Board of Health on Monday last week voted to support a bill currently under discussion in the House of Representatives. The bill, filed by State Representative Sarah K. Peake, and sponsored by nine other legislators, including known environmentalists in the State House, would create a 19-member commission to investigate and study the health impacts on individuals living within proximity of wind turbines in Massachusetts.
“I’ve been to hearings and met people who live on the Cape and I believe them that they are suffering as a result of being in proximity,” said Rep. Peake. “I am a believer in wind energy, I just think there are appropriate places for them and this commission will determine if there are places where turbines shouldn’t be placed.”
The bill was brought to the attention of the board by Linda H. Ohkagawa of West Falmouth Highway, who said the bill felt like a breath of fresh air compared to past studies. Ms. Ohkagawa went to the bill hearing on July 9 at the State House, where she was joined by other Falmouth turbine abutters.
Rep. Peake said she realizes there already have been a number of studies done, but the importance of this study, she said, was its dissociation from the Department of Public Health.
The DPH is part of the executive branch, she said, which has been trying to increase the use of renewable energy, and that’s a good thing, but not when testing the adverse effects of these renewable energies.
“With an administration trying to increase wind power while at the same time studying the effects of wind power,” she said, “that’s a little like having a fox in the hen house.”
Members on the commission would include residents who say that they have been affected by the wind turbines , a key voice that Rep. Peake said has been missing from past studies.
“They will have a seat at the table as well,” she said. It is important to give them a voice in the debate, she said. Three who have claimed to have health effects and live 5,000 feet from turbines would be assigned to the commission, appointed by the regional planning agencies of counties in Barnstable, Berkshire and southern Massachusetts.
On the other hand, she is not overly optimistic, stating that these types of bills can be held over for long periods. At the bill’s July 9 hearing, it was passed to the Massachusetts Joint Committee on Public Health. The health committee can wait to act on the bill until March of 2014, although Rep. Peake hopes they will move on it long before that.
She said that it is extremely helpful when a board of health sends a letter, proving that there is a broad base of support for the bill. The board of health in Falmouth is especially important, she said, because it has firsthand experience with the turbine issue.
Others in the commission, appointed by the governor, would include one member of Wind Wise-Massachusetts and one from Wind Wise-Cape Cod, two wind energy advocacy organizations; two members from local boards of health in areas with complaints; two physicians considered experts on adverse impacts from turbines; one PhD researcher from the National Institutes of Health specializing in the field of otolaryngology; and one physician who has written an article in an internationally recognized journal on the health effects of turbines.
“I’ve been to hearings and met people who live on the Cape and I believe them that they are suffering as a result of being in proximity,” said Rep. Peake. “I am a believer in wind energy, I just think there are appropriate places for them and this commission will determine if there are places where turbines shouldn’t be placed.”
The bill was brought to the attention of the board by Linda H. Ohkagawa of West Falmouth Highway, who said the bill felt like a breath of fresh air compared to past studies. Ms. Ohkagawa went to the bill hearing on July 9 at the State House, where she was joined by other Falmouth turbine abutters.
Rep. Peake said she realizes there already have been a number of studies done, but the importance of this study, she said, was its dissociation from the Department of Public Health.
The DPH is part of the executive branch, she said, which has been trying to increase the use of renewable energy, and that’s a good thing, but not when testing the adverse effects of these renewable energies.
“With an administration trying to increase wind power while at the same time studying the effects of wind power,” she said, “that’s a little like having a fox in the hen house.”
Members on the commission would include residents who say that they have been affected by the wind turbines , a key voice that Rep. Peake said has been missing from past studies.
“They will have a seat at the table as well,” she said. It is important to give them a voice in the debate, she said. Three who have claimed to have health effects and live 5,000 feet from turbines would be assigned to the commission, appointed by the regional planning agencies of counties in Barnstable, Berkshire and southern Massachusetts.
On the other hand, she is not overly optimistic, stating that these types of bills can be held over for long periods. At the bill’s July 9 hearing, it was passed to the Massachusetts Joint Committee on Public Health. The health committee can wait to act on the bill until March of 2014, although Rep. Peake hopes they will move on it long before that.
She said that it is extremely helpful when a board of health sends a letter, proving that there is a broad base of support for the bill. The board of health in Falmouth is especially important, she said, because it has firsthand experience with the turbine issue.
Others in the commission, appointed by the governor, would include one member of Wind Wise-Massachusetts and one from Wind Wise-Cape Cod, two wind energy advocacy organizations; two members from local boards of health in areas with complaints; two physicians considered experts on adverse impacts from turbines; one PhD researcher from the National Institutes of Health specializing in the field of otolaryngology; and one physician who has written an article in an internationally recognized journal on the health effects of turbines.
2013年7月29日 星期一
Benefits outweigh the problems
As the 4CG director chosen by shareholders to develop local renewable energy projects I have also become a director in Awel Deg. This is because Awel Deg not only share the same community ownership structure as 4CG but share the same aims to develop the local economy sustainably to benefit local businesses and individuals rather than finance and opportunity leaving the area.
As there have been several significant studies on the effect of windfarms on tourism and the local economy (Welsh Development Agency plus studies in Devon and Cumbria) all finding insignificant effect and as the Ferwig turbine is not a windfarm but a single machine there is very little chance that any economic damage will occur and in fact there is a good chance that eco-tourism from more monied visitors will improve the local tourism sector. This is because the opportunities to site a local community owned wind turbine returning significant gain back to the local community are very rare.
This rarity will generate news stories and marketing for the Cardigan area as a destination where local people have created something sustainable and special, well worth visiting and hopefully also attracting incoming investment in jobs from forward looking companies who feel that they could benefit from the ‘brand’ of such a forward looking sustainable area. Why rare?, not only must all the stringent technical constraints be overcome but the site must be windy to generate good levels of renewable power and income and most importantly, there must be a partnering landowner willing to rent his land for a fraction of what could be earned from developing the turbine themselves.
The UK needs new renewable energy generation badly as recently confirmed by Ed Davy the Secretary of State for the relevant Westminster ministry and all compliant sites will be seriously considered for wind generation. If the local community cannot achieve their own wind development , commercial developers will step in with next to no gain for local people and yet again money and opportunity will leave the area.
In a nutshell, the proposed turbine in Ferwig has been proven in technical studies to comply with all of the technical constraints required to be overcome by planning as it is sited to be further from housing than required to limit noise to a nationally accepted level, does not interrupt radar from Aberporth, is not on a recognised significant bird migratory route, complies with Welsh Assembly policy to develop Welsh wind energy resource and most importantly will generate approximately 420,000 per year in Feed in Tariff and energy sales income.
It is possible to ‘book’ your Feed in Tariff rate the day after planning approval has been given to maintain this income against future political changes and if sufficient local community enterprise shareholders can be found to benefit from the likely 5% tax free return on shares to raise the 1.25M project cost, this income is guaranteed by the government for 20 years.
This means that the project will generate over 8 million to benefit the local economy in the form of good local investments, rent for a local farmer, jobs in turbine maintenance and in distribution of the 5million ‘profit’ all to be spent on local projects chosen by our community shareholders.More information about the program is available on the web site at scfwindturbine.com.
As there have been several significant studies on the effect of windfarms on tourism and the local economy (Welsh Development Agency plus studies in Devon and Cumbria) all finding insignificant effect and as the Ferwig turbine is not a windfarm but a single machine there is very little chance that any economic damage will occur and in fact there is a good chance that eco-tourism from more monied visitors will improve the local tourism sector. This is because the opportunities to site a local community owned wind turbine returning significant gain back to the local community are very rare.
This rarity will generate news stories and marketing for the Cardigan area as a destination where local people have created something sustainable and special, well worth visiting and hopefully also attracting incoming investment in jobs from forward looking companies who feel that they could benefit from the ‘brand’ of such a forward looking sustainable area. Why rare?, not only must all the stringent technical constraints be overcome but the site must be windy to generate good levels of renewable power and income and most importantly, there must be a partnering landowner willing to rent his land for a fraction of what could be earned from developing the turbine themselves.
The UK needs new renewable energy generation badly as recently confirmed by Ed Davy the Secretary of State for the relevant Westminster ministry and all compliant sites will be seriously considered for wind generation. If the local community cannot achieve their own wind development , commercial developers will step in with next to no gain for local people and yet again money and opportunity will leave the area.
In a nutshell, the proposed turbine in Ferwig has been proven in technical studies to comply with all of the technical constraints required to be overcome by planning as it is sited to be further from housing than required to limit noise to a nationally accepted level, does not interrupt radar from Aberporth, is not on a recognised significant bird migratory route, complies with Welsh Assembly policy to develop Welsh wind energy resource and most importantly will generate approximately 420,000 per year in Feed in Tariff and energy sales income.
It is possible to ‘book’ your Feed in Tariff rate the day after planning approval has been given to maintain this income against future political changes and if sufficient local community enterprise shareholders can be found to benefit from the likely 5% tax free return on shares to raise the 1.25M project cost, this income is guaranteed by the government for 20 years.
This means that the project will generate over 8 million to benefit the local economy in the form of good local investments, rent for a local farmer, jobs in turbine maintenance and in distribution of the 5million ‘profit’ all to be spent on local projects chosen by our community shareholders.More information about the program is available on the web site at scfwindturbine.com.
ROC launches small wind turbine certification
A technology certification and testing platform for small wind turbines was recently launched by the Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection under the ROC Ministry of Economic Affairs, further underscoring Taiwan’s leadership in this key green energy sector.
“Nearly two and a half years in the making, the measure is part of ongoing government efforts to promote development of homegrown small to medium wind turbines and related product standards,” a BSMI official said July 26.
The facility has helped wind farms in Tainan City’s Chigu District and outlying Penghu County secure certification from global organizations including Norway-headquartered Det Norske Veritas, Taiwan Accreditation Foundation and Germany-based TUV SUD, the official added.
Demand for small wind turbines has grown at an annual rate of 35 percent over the past five years, with the sector set to expand at least 20 percent per annum until 2020.
“Product accreditation is a must if firms are to benefit from policy subsidies adopted by most governments in promoting green energy,” the official said.
Taiwan’s two testing farms will help firms reduce costs in obtaining global certification by around 60 percent, or NT$2 million (US$66,667), and cut handling time by 33 percent, the official said, adding that the centers are expected to generate revenues of NT$34.5 million per year.
Working with state-run Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, BSMI also successfully developed a technological know-how significantly reducing product certification time for vertical axis small wind turbines. The bureau has helped New Taipei City-headquartered Hi-VAWT Technology Corp. obtain certification from Japan’s ClassNK, the world’s largest classification society.
Citing MOEA statistics, the official said 94 percent of locally produced small wind turbines are for export, with mainland China accounting for 40 of shipments.
The official said the bureau is also striving to obtain mutual recognition of testing reports and compile annual surveys of market developments on both sides of the strait.
Other government measures aimed at enhancing Taiwan’s R&D capability in the sector include greater participation in global conferences and seminars; arranging mutual visits by officials from Australia, Japan and South Korea; and establishing an Asia-Pacific small wind turbines forum.
“Nearly two and a half years in the making, the measure is part of ongoing government efforts to promote development of homegrown small to medium wind turbines and related product standards,” a BSMI official said July 26.
The facility has helped wind farms in Tainan City’s Chigu District and outlying Penghu County secure certification from global organizations including Norway-headquartered Det Norske Veritas, Taiwan Accreditation Foundation and Germany-based TUV SUD, the official added.
Demand for small wind turbines has grown at an annual rate of 35 percent over the past five years, with the sector set to expand at least 20 percent per annum until 2020.
“Product accreditation is a must if firms are to benefit from policy subsidies adopted by most governments in promoting green energy,” the official said.
Taiwan’s two testing farms will help firms reduce costs in obtaining global certification by around 60 percent, or NT$2 million (US$66,667), and cut handling time by 33 percent, the official said, adding that the centers are expected to generate revenues of NT$34.5 million per year.
Working with state-run Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, BSMI also successfully developed a technological know-how significantly reducing product certification time for vertical axis small wind turbines. The bureau has helped New Taipei City-headquartered Hi-VAWT Technology Corp. obtain certification from Japan’s ClassNK, the world’s largest classification society.
Citing MOEA statistics, the official said 94 percent of locally produced small wind turbines are for export, with mainland China accounting for 40 of shipments.
To assist local suppliers in expanding their mainland Chinese footprint,
BSMI has worked with authorities on the other side to set up a standard testing procedure for vertical axis small wind turbines in May. This is the first set of mutually accepted testing standards for both sides.The official said the bureau is also striving to obtain mutual recognition of testing reports and compile annual surveys of market developments on both sides of the strait.
Other government measures aimed at enhancing Taiwan’s R&D capability in the sector include greater participation in global conferences and seminars; arranging mutual visits by officials from Australia, Japan and South Korea; and establishing an Asia-Pacific small wind turbines forum.
2013年7月10日 星期三
Democratic electric
Anti-wind campaigners are angry that areas including the forests made famous by the tales of the brothers Grimm are among the targets for new turbines.
For the first time they have formed a national opposition group to thwart the expansion.
They say the growth of wind will damage forests and tourism across the country.
Germany has embarked on a massive expansion of renewable energy in the wake of the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011. Chancellor Merkel's government decided to phase out atomic plants more rapidly and instead increased the opportunities for green power.
With guaranteed prices for 20 years thanks to feed-in tariffs enshrined in law, solar farms, biogas plants and wind parks have boomed. There are now 1.3 million small co-operatives and households supplying renewable energy to the grid.
This Energiewende or energy transformation has been remarkably successful, with 22% of Germany's electricity being generated by renewables in 2012. Wind has played a major part in this change, and the public has been generally supportive, despite rapidly increasing energy bills.
To date, a majority of the 23,000 Home Wind Turbine in the country have been built in the flatter north and eastern parts of the country. But now the focus of expansion is on the picture postcard areas of dark forest and lush green hills in the central and southern areas of Germany.
One such region is the Rheinhardswald in the northern part of the state of Hesse. This is the home of the magical tales of Sleeping Beauty, Rapunzel and others, made famous in the books of the brothers Grimm.
This quiet, scenic place is a magnet for tourists from all over the world.
But now there are also plans to build up to 200 turbines on the surrounding hills.
Ann-Kathrin Blankenberg is a PhD student and a vocal opponent of the plans.
"
"I want the green movement, I want green technology, I don't want nuclear power - but they should be made in the right way and not by destroying the forest.
"We have here special, old growth forest and some species just live in this area and are in danger because of the turbines."
The campaigners argue that putting residential wind turbines company in this area makes no sense. The wind speeds are low and the area is home to some extremely rare birds including the endangered black stork.
Across Germany, the plans for expansion have pitted green against green - the potential damage to natural resources from the building of turbines seems to be the biggest concern for opponents.
About 170 regional groups opposed to wind energy have now formed a national organisation called Vernunftkraft, to fight the expansion of turbines. They are trying to get enough signatures on a petition to force the German parliament to debate the future direction of the Energiewende, especially the subsidies for wind energy.
For the first time they have formed a national opposition group to thwart the expansion.
They say the growth of wind will damage forests and tourism across the country.
Germany has embarked on a massive expansion of renewable energy in the wake of the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011. Chancellor Merkel's government decided to phase out atomic plants more rapidly and instead increased the opportunities for green power.
With guaranteed prices for 20 years thanks to feed-in tariffs enshrined in law, solar farms, biogas plants and wind parks have boomed. There are now 1.3 million small co-operatives and households supplying renewable energy to the grid.
This Energiewende or energy transformation has been remarkably successful, with 22% of Germany's electricity being generated by renewables in 2012. Wind has played a major part in this change, and the public has been generally supportive, despite rapidly increasing energy bills.
To date, a majority of the 23,000 Home Wind Turbine in the country have been built in the flatter north and eastern parts of the country. But now the focus of expansion is on the picture postcard areas of dark forest and lush green hills in the central and southern areas of Germany.
One such region is the Rheinhardswald in the northern part of the state of Hesse. This is the home of the magical tales of Sleeping Beauty, Rapunzel and others, made famous in the books of the brothers Grimm.
This quiet, scenic place is a magnet for tourists from all over the world.
But now there are also plans to build up to 200 turbines on the surrounding hills.
Ann-Kathrin Blankenberg is a PhD student and a vocal opponent of the plans.
"
It is not because this is the area of Sleeping Beauty
," she says."I want the green movement, I want green technology, I don't want nuclear power - but they should be made in the right way and not by destroying the forest.
"We have here special, old growth forest and some species just live in this area and are in danger because of the turbines."
The campaigners argue that putting residential wind turbines company in this area makes no sense. The wind speeds are low and the area is home to some extremely rare birds including the endangered black stork.
Across Germany, the plans for expansion have pitted green against green - the potential damage to natural resources from the building of turbines seems to be the biggest concern for opponents.
About 170 regional groups opposed to wind energy have now formed a national organisation called Vernunftkraft, to fight the expansion of turbines. They are trying to get enough signatures on a petition to force the German parliament to debate the future direction of the Energiewende, especially the subsidies for wind energy.
2013年7月8日 星期一
No decision on date to remove turbines
Transport Canada officials will work with a wind turbine company to set a practical deadline for the removal of eight turbines south of the Chatham-Kent Municipal Airport.
Brooke Williams, a spokesperson for Transport Canada, told The Daily News Monday no decision has been made on a date.
She did say that on at least two occasions prior to installation of the wind turbines, Transport Canada advised the wind farm representatives that height restrictions were in effect in the area around the airport.
The Daily News learned in June that Transport Canada was enforcing safety rules and requires the removal of eight wind turbines that are impeding height restrictions imposed by the airport zoning regulations.
Dave Timm, vice-president of GDF Suez Canada Inc., claims the company complied with all the rules and regulations regarding the placement of turbines near the airport.
Timm said his company is asking for a meeting with Transport Canada officials to discuss the matter.
The Daily News has learned that Chatham-Kent Mayor Randy Hope has sent a letter to Transport Canada critical of their handling of the announcement that eight turbines had to be removed.
He said the media learned of Transport Canada's decision before the company was made aware of the concerns.
Williams told The Daily News Monday Transport Canada does not approve wind turbines or wind farms.
"Transport Canada's role with respect to obstacles such as wind turbines is to assess them for lighting and marking requirements in support of aviation safety in accordance with the Canadian Aviation Regulations,'' she said.
She said an assessment of a wind turbine or wind farm from Transport Canada does not constitute an authorization to construct because land use falls under provincial/municipal jurisdiction.
Timm could not be reached Monday for comment.
Chatham-Kent Essex MPP Rick Nicholls also complained to Transport Canada about the close proximity of turbines to the airport.
"Not only do they make it unsafe for pilots but I'm told the spinning blades affect radar,'' he said.
Nicholls is also concerned that the turbines would limit use of the airport by larger companies that might consider locating in Chatham-Kent and making use of company planes.
Chatham Coun. Michael Bondy said wind turbines and airports don't mix.
"Why would you risk the life of a pilot for a little bit of turbine-generated electricity?'' he asked.
Bondy said his concern is that the municipality may end up having to pay the huge demolition cost because the turbine company was issued municipally-approved building permits. More information about the program is available on the web site at www.scfwindturbine.com.
Brooke Williams, a spokesperson for Transport Canada, told The Daily News Monday no decision has been made on a date.
She did say that on at least two occasions prior to installation of the wind turbines, Transport Canada advised the wind farm representatives that height restrictions were in effect in the area around the airport.
The Daily News learned in June that Transport Canada was enforcing safety rules and requires the removal of eight wind turbines that are impeding height restrictions imposed by the airport zoning regulations.
Dave Timm, vice-president of GDF Suez Canada Inc., claims the company complied with all the rules and regulations regarding the placement of turbines near the airport.
Timm said his company is asking for a meeting with Transport Canada officials to discuss the matter.
The Daily News has learned that Chatham-Kent Mayor Randy Hope has sent a letter to Transport Canada critical of their handling of the announcement that eight turbines had to be removed.
He said the media learned of Transport Canada's decision before the company was made aware of the concerns.
Williams told The Daily News Monday Transport Canada does not approve wind turbines or wind farms.
"Transport Canada's role with respect to obstacles such as wind turbines is to assess them for lighting and marking requirements in support of aviation safety in accordance with the Canadian Aviation Regulations,'' she said.
She said an assessment of a wind turbine or wind farm from Transport Canada does not constitute an authorization to construct because land use falls under provincial/municipal jurisdiction.
Timm could not be reached Monday for comment.
Chatham-Kent Essex MPP Rick Nicholls also complained to Transport Canada about the close proximity of turbines to the airport.
"Not only do they make it unsafe for pilots but I'm told the spinning blades affect radar,'' he said.
Nicholls is also concerned that the turbines would limit use of the airport by larger companies that might consider locating in Chatham-Kent and making use of company planes.
Chatham Coun. Michael Bondy said wind turbines and airports don't mix.
"Why would you risk the life of a pilot for a little bit of turbine-generated electricity?'' he asked.
Bondy said his concern is that the municipality may end up having to pay the huge demolition cost because the turbine company was issued municipally-approved building permits. More information about the program is available on the web site at www.scfwindturbine.com.
2013年7月5日 星期五
Balochistan suitable for wind energy
The government is keen to commence wind farm projects in the country to meet some percentage of the national energy requirement through renewable energy technologies. According to an official of AEDB, wind energy is cost effective and can become a substitute to thermal power generation with investments from private sector.
According to data available with AEDB and Pakistan Meteorological Department, preliminary site surveys carried out in late nineties and early years of this century indicated that coastal areas of Sindh and Balochistan provinces and some northern areas possess adequate wind resources.
The official reports identify that in Sindh province, district Thatta, Karachi, Hyderabad and Badin and in Balochistan province, district Gwadar and Makran Coastal Belt possess prospective sites for development, installation and commissioning of wind farm projects.
The government plans to achieve up to 2,500MW from wind energy by the end of 2015. Wind energy is sustainable, clean, safe, economically competitive and creates jobs. The first energy wind power project in Pakistan started working with a 50MW generation capacity in Jhimpir, Sindh in December 2012. Alternative Energy Development Board (AEDB) recently approved a New Park Energy Phase-I, 400MW wind project near Port Qasim.
Pakistan has the potential of producing approximately 150,000MW of wind energy, says a recent United States Agency for International Development (USAID) report. The wind projects can fetch an investment of around two billion dollars.
According to another study, Pakistan has identified cumulative potential to generate 3.2 million MW from renewable energy resources including 340,000MW from wind, 2.9 million MW from solar, 50,000MW from hydro (large), 3,100MW from hydro (small), 1,800MW from bagasses cogeneration and 500MW from waste. A mean annual wind speed (at 10 m and 30 m above ground) of 18 kmph and 22 kmph respectively is considered as the minimum required for feasible generation of electricity.
Knowing the growing energy requirement of the country, and depleting energy resource within the country, the Government of Pakistan deems to diversify its energy mix so that dependency over imported fuel may be reduced and some percentages of power requirement may be met through indigenously available renewable energy technologies.
During wind mapping of coastal areas of Sindh and Balochistan provinces, data from 20 wind monitoring stations has been collected and analyzed. The data indicates that a wind corridor is available in the general area from Hyderabad to Kati Bandar having immense potential to generate electricity. Developing wind power plants in Jhimpir, Gharo, Keti Bandar and Bin Qasim in Sindh will not only reduce electricity shortages but will also ease burden of oil imports of $ 12 billion annually.
The bulk of this wind resource is derived from the energy of the great southwest monsoon system which blows over Pakistan from June to September.
This wind corridor extends up to Rajhistan Province (India) where several wind farm projects have been installed by Government of India.
The market analyses of wind turbine generators (WTGs) indicate that the manufacturing industry has developed commercial WTGs of 5 MW capacity.
The available wind potential demands that wind turbines of at least 750 kW capacity should be installed for power generation.
Wind farms will help in reducing environmental consequences due to reduction in dependency over fossil fuels for power generation.
According to data available with AEDB and Pakistan Meteorological Department, preliminary site surveys carried out in late nineties and early years of this century indicated that coastal areas of Sindh and Balochistan provinces and some northern areas possess adequate wind resources.
The official reports identify that in Sindh province, district Thatta, Karachi, Hyderabad and Badin and in Balochistan province, district Gwadar and Makran Coastal Belt possess prospective sites for development, installation and commissioning of wind farm projects.
The government plans to achieve up to 2,500MW from wind energy by the end of 2015. Wind energy is sustainable, clean, safe, economically competitive and creates jobs. The first energy wind power project in Pakistan started working with a 50MW generation capacity in Jhimpir, Sindh in December 2012. Alternative Energy Development Board (AEDB) recently approved a New Park Energy Phase-I, 400MW wind project near Port Qasim.
Pakistan has the potential of producing approximately 150,000MW of wind energy, says a recent United States Agency for International Development (USAID) report. The wind projects can fetch an investment of around two billion dollars.
According to another study, Pakistan has identified cumulative potential to generate 3.2 million MW from renewable energy resources including 340,000MW from wind, 2.9 million MW from solar, 50,000MW from hydro (large), 3,100MW from hydro (small), 1,800MW from bagasses cogeneration and 500MW from waste. A mean annual wind speed (at 10 m and 30 m above ground) of 18 kmph and 22 kmph respectively is considered as the minimum required for feasible generation of electricity.
Knowing the growing energy requirement of the country, and depleting energy resource within the country, the Government of Pakistan deems to diversify its energy mix so that dependency over imported fuel may be reduced and some percentages of power requirement may be met through indigenously available renewable energy technologies.
During wind mapping of coastal areas of Sindh and Balochistan provinces, data from 20 wind monitoring stations has been collected and analyzed. The data indicates that a wind corridor is available in the general area from Hyderabad to Kati Bandar having immense potential to generate electricity. Developing wind power plants in Jhimpir, Gharo, Keti Bandar and Bin Qasim in Sindh will not only reduce electricity shortages but will also ease burden of oil imports of $ 12 billion annually.
The bulk of this wind resource is derived from the energy of the great southwest monsoon system which blows over Pakistan from June to September.
This wind corridor extends up to Rajhistan Province (India) where several wind farm projects have been installed by Government of India.
The market analyses of wind turbine generators (WTGs) indicate that the manufacturing industry has developed commercial WTGs of 5 MW capacity.
The available wind potential demands that wind turbines of at least 750 kW capacity should be installed for power generation.
Wind farms will help in reducing environmental consequences due to reduction in dependency over fossil fuels for power generation.
訂閱：
意見 (Atom)